
Choosing the right proxies for web scraping can directly affect request success, stability, and overall cost. Providers differ in proxy types, geo-targeting, connection quality, pricing, and target compatibility. The wrong choice can mean more failed requests, more retries, and wasted traffic.
This guide compares five proxy providers for web scraping: IPcook, Oxylabs, SOAX, Webshare, and IPRoyal. Each has a different strength, from enterprise scale and precise geo-targeting to lower costs and flexible purchasing. The comparison below can help you choose the best proxies for scraping, based on your budget, scraping volume, and target websites.

IPcook is a good choice for teams looking for proxies for web scraping without committing to a large monthly traffic plan. Its residential proxies use IPs from real residential networks, which makes requests appear closer to normal user traffic. This can be useful when target sites are more sensitive to datacenter IPs or when location matters for the data being collected. Its pricing model works well for projects with changing traffic needs. Purchased traffic does not expire, so unused balance can be used later.
IPcook also offers flexible session control for different web scraping needs. Rotating sessions assign different IPs to short, independent requests. This helps distribute scraping traffic and works well for e-commerce data collection. Meanwhile, sticky sessions keep the same IP throughout a session. This is useful for scraping tasks that require continuity. IPcook also supports city-level targeting across 185 locations. This makes it easier to scrape search results, monitor regional prices, and collect location-specific data for market research.
Pros
Pool and coverage: More than 55 million residential IPs are available across over 185 global locations.
Pricing: Plans start at $3.20 per GB for 1 GB, with enterprise rates as low as $0.30 per GB.
Traffic terms: Purchased residential traffic does not expire, so that it can remain available for later projects.
Performance: Average response time is under 0.5 seconds, with 99.99% network uptime.
Session control: Users can rotate IPs or keep sticky residential sessions active for up to 24 hours.
Protocol support: Residential proxies support HTTP and SOCKS5 protocols, offering broad compatibility.
Cons
Pool size: The residential pool is smaller than the networks published by Oxylabs and SOAX.
Limited analytics: The dashboard covers basic traffic usage, but advanced users may want more request-level insights.

Large-scale scraping needs more reliable proxy infrastructure. Oxylabs is designed for enterprise teams. Large teams may run many concurrent jobs, divide traffic across multiple countries, and require account-level controls rather than a simple proxy endpoint. For these teams, Oxylabs stands out for its ability to support high concurrency, monitoring, and recurring large-scale workloads.
Its large IP pool and targeting options make it a strong choice for proxies for web scraping across multiple markets. Oxylabs also provides dedicated support and enterprise account management. These features may matter more to teams that depend on scraping in production. For a small scraper with limited traffic, however, those capabilities may add cost without improving the result enough to justify the difference.
Pros
Pool and coverage: Oxylabs has 175+ million residential IPs with access across 195 global locations.
Performance: Oxylabs reports an average response time of about 0.6 seconds and a 99.95% success rate.
Targeting: Location filters cover country, city, state, ZIP code, coordinates, and ASN.
Enterprise support: Plans include 24/7 support and a dedicated account manager.
Cons
Higher cost: Pricing can be difficult to justify for small or low-volume scraping projects.
No pay-as-you-go: Residential proxies require a monthly plan, which is less flexible for irregular traffic.

When location changes the content a scraper sees, proxies for web scraping need more precise geo-targeting. This is where SOAX stands out. Search results, product availability, shipping information, advertising, and local pricing can all change by region. A country-only selector may not be enough when the scraper needs to reproduce results from a particular city, ISP, or network segment.
SOAX addresses this requirement with filters that go beyond basic country selection. A data team can use region, city, ISP, or ASN parameters to make the source location closer to the market being measured. That can improve the consistency of regional comparisons, although it also makes configuration more demanding. However, for projects with little need for location-level control, the added complexity and potential cost may not be justified.
Pros
Geo targeting: You can select country, region, city, ISP, or ASN based on the needs of each scraping task.
Pool and coverage: It provides 155+ million residential IPs across over 195 geographic locations.
Performance: SOAX reports a 0.55-second proxy response time and a 99.95 percent success rate.
Several protocols: The service supports HTTP, SOCKS5, UDP, and QUIC protocols.
Cons
Pricing complexity: Rates vary by location tier, which can make costs harder to predict when scraping multiple markets.
Limited usage diagnostics: The dashboard does not show success rate, latency, or domain-level usage data.

Webshare has a low barrier to entry, which makes it practical for developers and small teams that are still testing a scraping workflow. Its platform has a strong self-service focus, so users can create an account, configure proxies, and start without an enterprise sales process. The rotating residential product also gives access to many IPs, with country, state, city, ZIP, and ASN filters.
Its appeal for budget-focused scraping is straightforward. One GB of rotating residential traffic costs $3.50/month, while 3,000 GB plans reduce the rate to $1.40/GB. For teams that want lower-cost proxies for scraping public pages, this is a practical way to start. Still, a low proxy price does not guarantee the lowest cost per successful page. For larger projects, however, IPcook can be even more cost-efficient, with enterprise rates as low as $0.30/GB while still offering core residential proxy features.
Pros
Pricing: A 1 GB monthly plan costs $3.50, while larger plans can reduce the rate to $1.40 per GB.
Pool and coverage: Webshare offers 80+ million residential IPs with coverage across 195 countries.
Geo targeting: Residential users can filter IPs by country, state, city, ZIP code, and ASN.
Network features: Residential proxies support HTTP and SOCKS5, and it reports 99.97% network uptime.
Cons
No traffic rollover: Unused residential proxy traffic expires at the end of each billing cycle and does not roll over to the next month.
Possible verification interruptions: Compliance checks can temporarily pause proxy access until account verification is completed.

IPRoyal is a good fit for scraping workflows that need to keep the same IP across multiple requests. Sticky sessions can last for up to seven days, which is useful for multi-step crawls and other tasks that benefit from a stable session. However, the session depends on the residential device staying online, so the IP may change before the full seven-day period ends.
IPRoyal also offers a high-end pool for subscribers. It uses faster and more responsive residential IPs, which can help with scraping tasks that are sensitive to response speed. However, enabling this option reduces the size of the available proxy pool.
Pros
Session control: Residential proxies support rotation and sticky sessions with a TTL of up to 7 days.
Traffic terms: Traffic does not expire, and users can choose subscription or pay-as-you-go billing.
Pool and coverage: IPRoyal provides more than 64 million residential IPs across over 195 countries.
Performance: It reports about a 0.5-second response time and a 99.4% success rate.
Cons
Higher low-volume cost: Small residential traffic packages are relatively expensive compared with several alternatives.
Performance consistency: Third-party testing found slower outlier IPs and more connection failures than some premium competitors.
The details above matter, but a quick side-by-side view makes the trade-offs clearer. The table compares the residential proxy offerings of all five providers, as residential proxies are widely used as web scraping proxies for IP-sensitive and geo-targeted tasks.
Provider | IP Pool | Pricing | Coverage | Rotation / Sticky Sessions | Response Speed | Success Rate | Best For |
IPcook | 55M+ | $0.30/GB, Enterprise custom pricing | 185+ locations | ✔️ | Below 0.5s average | 99.99% | Value focused web scraping |
Oxylabs | 175M+ | $2.50/GB, 1 TB plan ($2,500/month) | 195 locations | ✔️ | 0.6s average | 99.95% average | Enterprise scraping |
SOAX | 155M+ |
| 195+ locations | ✔️ | 0.55s | 99.95% | Precise location targeting |
Webshare | 80M+ | $1.40/GB, 3,000 GB plan ($4,200/month) | 195 countries | ✔️ | Not publicly stated for residential proxies | 99.7% across its proxy service | Budget conscious self service |
IPRoyal | 64M+ | $1.75/GB, subscription pricing from 10 TB | 195+ countries | ✔️ | About 0.5s | 99.40% | Long-running scraping sessions |
Note: Pricing reflects the lowest publicly listed residential proxy rate from each provider. Minimum traffic commitments or plan requirements may apply.
Yes. Small-scale data collection from public pages may work from one IP, especially when request volume is low. A proxy becomes more useful when traffic grows, the site applies IP-based rate limits, you need location-specific results, or one address becomes a bottleneck. The right proxy for web scraping depends on scale, target sensitivity, and whether location affects the data you receive.
Random public free proxy lists are usually a weak choice for ongoing scraping. Connection quality, speed, IP reputation, ownership, and security can be hard to verify. A free trial or free plan from an established provider is different because the provider and its terms are clear. If you only want to test your scraper, this is a more reliable option. IPcook currently offers 100 MB of residential traffic as a free trial.
No. A proxy changes the IP address and network location that a website sees, but it does not control every signal a site can evaluate. Request rate, cookies, session consistency, headers, and browser fingerprints can still affect access. If a scraper keeps receiving 403 responses or CAPTCHAs after you switch to a suitable proxy, the proxy may not be the only cause.
All 5 providers offer proxies for web scraping, but no single option is best for every workload. IPcook offers a strong value balance for residential traffic. Oxylabs fits enterprise teams that need scale and support. SOAX suits projects where precise geo targeting affects data quality. Webshare keeps the entry point low for self-service users. IPRoyal gives teams more choice in how they buy traffic.
If you want to balance residential proxy cost, flexibility, and core scraping features, IPcook is the best proxy for scraping among the five. Its non-expiring traffic, rotating and sticky sessions, and geo-targeting make it practical for projects with changing usage. Start with IPcook’s free trial and test it on your own target websites.