If you are trying to scrape Amazon reviews at any meaningful scale, you have likely realized that the hard part is not finding the data, but collecting it consistently. What works once or twice, such as copying reviews by hand or running a simple script, rarely holds up once volume increases. What begins as a small task quickly becomes a recurring operational issue that disrupts your workflow and consumes time.
This article breaks down how to scrape Amazon reviews using approaches that are designed for ongoing use rather than one-off tasks. It helps you understand which methods fit different needs, from small review samples to continuous data collection. By reading through the guide, you gain a clearer framework for choosing a scraping approach that fits your use case and avoiding common pitfalls before they slow you down.
When you need to scrape Amazon reviews across multiple products or over an extended period, browser automation is often one of the most stable options to consider. Instead of relying on repeated background requests, this approach follows the same visible paths users take when browsing review pages. As volume increases, that behavioral difference becomes increasingly important for keeping Amazon reviews scraping consistent.
Amazon review pages are built around user interactions. Sorting, filtering, and pagination are handled through on-page controls, and parts of the content load dynamically as users move between pages. Browser automation works through these same interactions, which helps reduce friction when you scrape Amazon reviews at scale.
Another advantage is control over navigation and pacing. Automated browsers can move through review pages sequentially, pause between actions, and operate within defined session limits. This makes access patterns more predictable and reduces the chance of interruptions during longer collection runs.
In many large-scale attempts at scraping Amazon reviews, failures are caused less by missing data and more by repetitive or unnatural access patterns. Browser automation gives you finer control over how pages are visited, which supports steadier collection over time. The workflow below focuses on control and predictability rather than speed.
1. Choose a product and identify its ASIN and marketplace
Begin by selecting the product you want to collect reviews for and confirming its ASIN. The marketplace is equally important, since review pages differ by regional site in terms of language, layout, and default sorting. When you scrape Amazon reviews across regions, these identifiers should be recorded with every review.
marketplace = "amazon.com"
asin = "B0XXXXXXX"Before moving on, you should clearly know which product and marketplace your data belongs to.
2. Open the product review page directly
Access the review listing page directly instead of navigating through the product detail page. Direct review URLs are easier to reuse and help avoid layout variations that can interrupt browser sessions.
reviews_url = "https://www.amazon.com/product-reviews/B0XXXXXXX"At this stage, the page should display a list of customer reviews with pagination controls.
3. Apply basic filters such as rating or date
Apply filters early to keep the dataset focused. Sorting by recent reviews is a common starting point for monitoring and repeated collection. When learning how to scrape Amazon reviews for analysis, filtering also reduces unnecessary pagination.
sort_order = "recent"
rating_filter = "all"Once applied, the visible reviews should reflect the criteria you plan to collect.
4. Browse review pages sequentially
Pagination defines how volume is handled. Move through review pages in order and set a clear limit so the process remains controlled. Without boundaries, pagination is often where scraping workflows become unstable.
start_page = 1
max_pages = 10You should always be able to confirm the current page number and stop at the defined limit.
5. Extract visible review information such as ratings, text, and dates
Focus on fields that are consistently visible across review pages. Ratings, titles, review text, and dates are sufficient for most research and analysis needs. Keeping a consistent schema matters more than collecting every possible field at once.
fields = ["rating", "title", "text", "date"]Each review should map cleanly to a single record using the same field structure.
6. Control browsing speed and session duration
Pacing plays a central role in stability. Introduce delays between page transitions and limit how long a browser session remains active. This step often determines whether scraping Amazon reviews continues smoothly as volume grows.
page_delay_seconds = (3, 7)
session_minutes = 20
pages_per_session = 30With these limits in place, browsing behavior remains steady instead of accelerating until access is interrupted.
7. Save scraped reviews in CSV or JSON format
Choose an output format based on how the data will be used. CSV works well for spreadsheets and reporting, while JSON integrates more easily with pipelines and databases. Including context such as ASIN and marketplace helps keep records traceable.
output_format = "csv"
file_name = "amazon_reviews_B0XXXXXXX"At the end of this step, reviews should be stored as structured records that can be reused without revisiting the page.
Reference Implementation (Optional, Playwright and Python)
The following example focuses on the core flow only. It loads the review page, paginates through a limited number of pages, extracts visible review fields, and saves the results. It is provided as a compact reference rather than a complete scraping setup.
import csv
import random
import time
from playwright.sync_api import sync_playwright
MARKETPLACE = "https://www.amazon.com"
ASIN = "B0XXXXXXX"
MAX_PAGES = 5
def sleep():
time.sleep(random.uniform(3, 6))
with sync_playwright() as p:
browser = p.chromium.launch(headless=True)
page = browser.new_page()
page.goto(f"{MARKETPLACE}/product-reviews/{ASIN}", wait_until="domcontentloaded")
sleep()
rows = []
page_num = 1
while page_num <= MAX_PAGES:
reviews = page.locator('div[data-hook="review"]')
for i in range(reviews.count()):
card = reviews.nth(i)
rows.append({
"rating": card.locator('[data-hook="review-star-rating"]').inner_text(),
"title": card.locator('[data-hook="review-title"]').inner_text(),
"text": card.locator('[data-hook="review-body"]').inner_text(),
"date": card.locator('[data-hook="review-date"]').inner_text(),
"page": page_num,
})
next_btn = page.locator("li.a-last a")
if next_btn.count() == 0:
break
sleep()
next_btn.click()
page_num += 1
sleep()
fieldnames = ["rating", "title", "text", "date", "page"]
with open("amazon_reviews.csv", "w", newline="", encoding="utf-8") as f:
writer = csv.DictWriter(f, fieldnames=fieldnames)
writer.writeheader()
writer.writerows(rows)
browser.close()Once collection reaches this point, the limiting factor is rarely extraction logic. Navigation patterns, pacing, and clear stopping conditions are what determine whether scraping Amazon reviews remains manageable as volume increases.
When Amazon reviews need to be collected through direct requests rather than browser interactions, a Python web scraper is a common approach teams consider. Instead of simulating user behavior, this method focuses on request sequencing, data structure, and output consistency. The sections below explain how this type of Amazon review scraper works and outline a workflow that can be adapted into a controlled collection process with clearly defined pacing and stopping rules. This approach is best suited for controlled, low-frequency collection or internal monitoring tasks.
Identify the target product and marketplace
Start by defining the product ASIN and the Amazon marketplace where reviews will be collected. Review page URLs depend on both values, and keeping them explicit avoids inconsistencies when scraping Amazon reviews across regions.
marketplace = "amazon.com"
asin = "B0XXXXXXX"Before sending requests, these identifiers should be clearly set and recorded.
Send requests sequentially
Requests should be sent in a controlled sequence rather than in bursts. Sequential access keeps request patterns predictable and makes progress easier to track.
request_interval_seconds = 5Each request at this stage should return a complete review page response.
Parse the returned content
Once a response is received, parse the content to confirm that the expected review layout is present. This step ensures that extraction logic is applied only to pages that actually contain reviews.
At this point, the scraper should reliably identify where reviews are located within the page structure.
Extract review fields
After parsing, extract a defined set of review fields. Ratings, review text, and dates are usually sufficient for most analysis tasks. Limiting the field set helps reduce maintenance when page structure changes.
fields = ["rating", "text", "date"]Each extracted review should map cleanly to a single structured record.
Handle pagination carefully
Pagination determines how many reviews are collected. Define a clear page limit and stop once it is reached. Without explicit boundaries, pagination is often where Amazon reviews scraping becomes unstable.
start_page = 1
max_pages = 5You should always know which page is being requested and when the scraper should stop.
Store results in CSV or JSON format
Save the extracted reviews in a format that fits your workflow. CSV works well for inspection and reporting, while JSON integrates more easily with data pipelines.
output_format = "csv"By the end of this step, the data should be usable without revisiting the source pages.
Both browser automation and Python scrapers can be used to scrape Amazon reviews, but they are suited to different scales and operational needs.
The table below highlights when each approach tends to work best.
Use case | Browser automation | Python scraper |
Small scale | ❌ | ✅ |
Long-term monitoring | ✅ | ⚠️ |
Maintenance cost | Low | High |
Speed | Medium | High |
Detection risk | Lower | Higher |
Python web scrapers are sensitive to request patterns. Repeated requests with consistent timing or from a single source can trigger access limits or inconsistent responses, even when scraping logic itself is correct.
Maintenance is another consideration. Because this approach relies on page structure, layout changes may require updates to parsing rules. Compared to browser automation, Python based scraping demands stricter control over request behavior and closer monitoring as scale increases.
Scraping Amazon reviews often works initially, then becomes unreliable as volume and frequency increase. Incomplete responses, slower requests, or blocked access are common once access behavior isn’t adjusted for scale.
The root cause is rarely the scraping method itself. Whether using browser automation or direct requests, most long-term failures are driven by how traffic is generated and where it originates.
Amazon actively monitors access patterns across its review pages. Scraping failures usually appear gradually and are rarely caused by parsing logic or code quality.
Instability typically comes from a few recurring factors:
Repetitive access patterns Requests that follow the same timing and sequence are easier to classify as automated behavior.
High-frequency traffic bursts Aggressive scraping over short periods increases the chance of throttling or incomplete responses.
Concentrated traffic sources Repeated access from a single network becomes easier to detect as scraping volume grows.
At small volume, these issues may not surface immediately. But when scraping Amazon reviews at scale, they quickly become the main reason workflows degrade over time. To keep Amazon review scraping stable at scale, using the best proxy for web scraping helps distribute traffic and reduce detection risks. This stability is reinforced when a dynamic IP setup prevents repeated requests from coming from the same source.
Long-term Amazon review scraping isn’t limited by scraping logic alone. As volume and frequency increase, the stability of the access environment becomes a deciding factor for workflows that run continuously.
IPcook provides best residential proxies for sustained scraping workflows, supporting both browser automation and Python-based scrapers when collecting Amazon reviews at scale.
Key features that support large-scale Amazon review scraping include:
Large residential IP pool (55M+ IPs across 185+ locations) to distribute review page requests and avoid traffic concentration
Rotating and sticky sessions (up to 24 hours) to support pagination, sorting, and long-running scraping jobs
Real residential network traffic that better matches typical Amazon user access patterns
HTTP and SOCKS5 protocol support, compatible with browser automation tools and Python scraping frameworks
Usage-based pricing starting at $0.5 per GB, allowing scraping volume to scale gradually without fixed commitments
With a stable access environment in place, Amazon review scraping workflows can scale more predictably as demand increases, without frequent interruptions.
👀 Related Reading
How to Scrape Twitter(X) Data with Python
Scraping Amazon reviews at scale is less about extracting data once and more about keeping access stable as volume grows. Whether using browser automation or direct Python requests, long-term reliability depends on predictable pacing, clear limits, and access patterns that blend into normal traffic.
IPcook supports this by providing residential proxies for sustained scraping workloads, helping distribute requests across real user networks and reduce detection risk over time. Learn more or try IPcook now to move beyond fragile scraping setups.
